Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for November, 2024

In education, we navigate a world full of challenges, each one demanding creativity and perseverance.  But some challenges are different – those that don’t fit neatly into categories or yield simple solutions. They’re not necessarily problems, crises, or opportunities—they’re just… tricky. You know the kind: situations with too many layers to unravel in one sitting or questions that don’t have a single right answer. When I hear someone describe something as “tricky,” my mind instantly goes to the iconic Run-D.M.C. song, It’s Tricky. If you’re already humming the chorus—“This beat is my recital, I think it’s very vital…”—you get it. Just like in the song, tricky moments require rhythm, effort, and a little bit of creativity to navigate.

So, what makes something tricky? It’s the layers. A tricky situation might involve balancing the needs of different students, navigating new technologies, or implementing a well-meaning procedure that not everyone fully supports. It’s the kind of challenge where the answers aren’t obvious, and sometimes you don’t even know the right questions to ask. Think about the first time we had to move to virtual learning overnight or tried to introduce equity-focused changes to deeply rooted and ingrained systems—tricky.

The beauty of the word “tricky” is that it reframes our mindset. Unlike heavier terms like “problem” or “crisis,” which can feel overwhelming, or even “opportunity,” which might feel overly optimistic, “tricky” sits in the middle. It’s a word that invites curiosity. It says, “This isn’t easy, but we’ll figure it out.” It’s nonjudgmental, leaving space for exploration, experimentation, and, yes, even failure.

Facing trickies in education requires us to lean on a few key strategies. First, curiosity over control. The best way to approach a tricky situation is with a willingness to learn. Instead of trying to force a solution, we can step back and ask, “What is this moment teaching us?” Second, collaboration over solitude. The best ideas don’t happen in isolation. When we come together, our collective creativity can turn the trickiest of challenges into manageable tasks. Finally, reflection over reaction. Trickies often tempt us to act quickly to resolve discomfort, but taking time to understand the complexity can lead to better, longer-lasting outcomes.

I’ve seen these strategies in action in my own work. A few years ago, we faced a particularly tricky challenge: how do we balance the populations at various elementary and secondary schools with minimal disruptions. We didn’t solve it overnight, but by involving students, families, and educators in the conversation, we started to chip away at it. The solution wasn’t perfect, but the process taught us how to listen, adapt, and build trust.

Trickies are part of the terrain in education—they’re not detours from the work but central to it. They stretch us, challenge us, and, when we embrace them, make us better at what we do. The trickies push us to innovate, to think more deeply, and to grow as a community.

So, the next time you encounter a tricky, channel your inner Run-D.M.C. Remember that it’s not just about surviving the challenge but finding the rhythm, leaning into the process, and maybe even enjoying the ride. “It’s tricky to rock a rhyme,” but as the song reminds us, tricky doesn’t mean impossible. Let’s embrace the trickies.

Thanks to my colleague Ian Kennedy, a seasoned educator and district leader for modeling how to embrace trickies with curiosity and resilience, and to the Roy Group for guiding our administrators in managing these complexities. 

Of course, now Ian knows I have Run DMC running through my head every time he talks about the trickies.  

The image at the top of the blog was created in Chat GPT 4.  Some of the research around Run DMC and their song “It’s Tricky” was based on a series of prompts in both Chat GPT 4 and Claude.

 

Read Full Post »

Recently, two insightful blog posts from my former West Vancouver colleagues and now superintendent colleagues Dave Eberwein in Saanich (his post here) and Sean Nosek from Abbotsford (his post here) have sparked fresh dialogue about our curriculum—specifically, what’s missing from it. Dave’s post, Why Don’t Schools Teach X?, and Sean’s, Beyond the Classroom: Preparing for Tomorrow, both tackle the growing calls for “adulting” skills in our K-12 system. While the desire for practical education in areas like budgeting, cooking, and basic repairs resonates with many, we must ask: Is K-12 education truly the right venue for these skills?

The push for “adulting” skills often surfaces as a critique of modern education. “If only schools taught more life skills,” the argument goes, “students would be better prepared for the real world.” Yet this perspective overlooks a fundamental truth: K-12 education isn’t merely about immediate functionality—it’s about building a foundation for lifelong learning and adaptability.  And yes, the truth is that schools should really be about both – preparing students with the immediate skills for the world and preparing them to be participants in shaping the changing world.

Our curriculum centers on core competencies: communication,  thinking, personal awareness, and social responsibility. These aren’t just academic abstractions; they’re versatile tools that students can apply across all aspects of life. The  thinking that helps decode complex literature can also untangle a confusing lease agreement. The collaboration skills honed in group projects translate directly to managing household responsibilities with your college roommates or family members.

Could we weave “adulting” skills more deliberately into existing subjects? Certainly. Mathematics classes already tackle financial literacy through real-world applications. Home economics programs teach food preparation and could expand more often to cover meal planning on a budget. Language arts and social studies naturally prompt discussions about housing, health, and personal responsibility through diverse texts and historical contexts.

However, we face real constraints. Each school day has limited hours, and every new addition to the curriculum means something else must give way. We’re constantly balancing depth against breadth, trying to cover an ever-expanding range of essential knowledge while maintaining meaningful engagement with each topic.

I am pitched dozens of topics each year by well meaning, passionate people with ideas on what should be included as part of the package of school.  And it is not that all these things aren’t important – should students know how to change a tire – yes, should they be able to do their taxes – yes, should they know first aid – of course, what about basic table manners  – absolutely!  There is no shortage of great things that it would be awesome if younger people knew – but when you come with an idea for school, also come with the item that you take out.  This is the challenge.  And moreover, we want to give students more choice in schools so a key goal of the last 20 years has been to make school more flexible and less restrictive.

I do think there are opportunities in  community partnerships. Many “adulting” skills—from understanding taxes to maintaining a car—are best learned through direct experience, often outside the classroom. Parents, community organizations, and local businesses can offer practical learning opportunities that complement, rather than compete with, core academic instruction.

The calls for “adulting” education, as both Dave and Sean note, reflect legitimate concerns about relevance. But perhaps the solution isn’t a dedicated “Adulting 101” course. Instead, we might focus on creating an education system that equips students with the foundational skills and confidence to master practical challenges as they arise.

As educators, our mission extends beyond preparing students for immediate practical challenges. We aim to nurture curiosity, resilience, and adaptability—qualities that serve students not just in managing daily tasks, but in navigating life’s broader journey. The key lies not in cramming more content into our curriculum, but in fostering a mindset that empowers students to tackle new challenges, seek out knowledge, and grow throughout their lives.

All that said, if my kids’ teachers could start teaching the recycling  process that includes putting the refundable cans in one bag and not just the blue box with other cans, and that cardboard boxes do not magically find their way to the yellow bag when they are thrown into the garage –  that would be appreciated!

What are your thoughts on this balance between practical skills and foundational learning? How do you see the role of K-12 education evolving to meet future needs while staying true to its core mission?

Read Full Post »

A decade ago, while contemplating innovation I wrote (HERE) about how meaningful change in education spreads through diffusion rather than replication. This is an idea that David Albury has written and spoken about regularly and been very influential in my thinking.

As we navigate the integration of generative AI in our schools today, this principle resonates more strongly than ever.

The early waves of AI adoption in education brought familiar pressures – the rush to replicate successful models, the search for universal “best practices,” and the desire for quick implementation.  If we only purchase the “right tool” amazing experiences will be happening similarly in all classrooms. But just as we learned with previous innovations, the most impactful changes come when we allow ideas to diffuse naturally, adapting to each teacher’s unique talents and each school’s and district’s unique context.  And then those of us in district positions try to network this work together.

Every School Tells Its Own AI Story

Walk into any school in our district, and you’ll see how AI tools are being embraced in distinctly different ways. In one class, teachers are exploring AI as a tool for differentiated instruction, helping students who need additional support while challenging those ready to dive deeper. In another, AI is supporting timely feedback as the teacher looks to see how it can help students in their writing process. And in many schools, AI is being used to support the completion of the administrative tasks of teaching.

This organic adoption isn’t chaos – it’s exactly how innovation should spread in education. When we trust educators to experiment and adapt AI tools to their specific needs, we see more authentic and sustainable integration.

The Heart of Diffusion is Trust

The key to successful diffusion lies in trusting our educators’ professional judgment.  I was speaking about this last week, and got the good question, “OK, so if this happens how do you respond to the parent of a child in one grade 3 class where no AI is being used when it is being richly used in the grade 3 class next door.”  This of course is not an AI issue, teachers have always found their own ways to adapt new tools in their classroom.  And what I have seen over 30 years is that when teacher A sees teacher B using something that is creating efficiencies and improving engagement and learning, they will want to be on the journey as well.

Rather than mandating specific AI applications or setting rigid implementation timelines, we’re creating spaces for teachers to explore, question, innovate and network together. We provide district-supported AI tools not to enforce uniform classroom usage but to support teachers and assure them that the tools they are exploring are safe to use with students. This approach acknowledges that our educators know their students best and are uniquely positioned to determine how AI can enhance their teaching practice.

Some teachers find AI to be a powerful tool for providing immediate feedback on student writing. Others are using it to generate personalized practice problems in mathematics. The common thread isn’t the specific application – it’s the thoughtful consideration of how these tools can serve their students’ needs.

Growing Together, Learning Together

As we continue this journey, we are seeing the power of organic networks forming among educators. Teachers are sharing their discoveries, challenges, and successes with AI integration, not as a blueprint to be copied, but as inspiration for others to adapt and build upon. This professional dialogue enriches our collective understanding and helps us navigate the ethical considerations that come with AI in education.

The future of AI in our schools won’t be determined by a single master plan or universal implementation strategy. Instead, it will emerge from thousands of small experiments, adjustments, and innovations happening in classrooms across our district and beyond. This is diffusion at its finest – messy, organic, and ultimately more transformative than any top-down initiative could be.

As we move forward, let’s remember that the goal isn’t to replicate success stories but to create the conditions where each teacher, school and district can write its own story of AI integration – one that reflects its unique community, challenges, and aspirations.

Interested in hearing 4 of these teacher stories?  Here is a video from a project we are doing with Dell and C21 Canada, supported in our district by Advanced Learning Partnerships and Dean Shareski. Such exciting times!

 

The image at the top of this post was created in Chat GPT.  Before publishing I used Claude as a grammar / spell check and to identify any statements that needed additional clarification or examples.

Read Full Post »