I promised I wouldn’t do it. But here it is.
It is a bit like Groundhog Day – if it is May school rankings are out and the education community is screaming foul. And yet we do this dance over and over. At a different time in my life I was a weekly columnist at the Richmond News, and here is one of many posts I wrote on school rankings – this one in 2003.
I actually thought we had broken the cycle. School rankings have received far less attention in recent years, but this year, they seem to have had a resurgence. In so many ways, we have moved to a post-standardized world in British Columbia, further differentiating ourselves from many U.S. jurisdictions. We live in a world of increasing personalized learning and one less reliant on ranking and sorting.
I couldn’t let the recent stories go without sharing my view. So, I penned some thoughts on the value of ranking schools. Here is a piece I shared with staff and parents in West Vancouver last week:
School success much more than a number
Some readers may have seen a recent front page article in the North Shore News about the annual Fraser Institute Elementary Report Card School Rankings, released in early May. Ecole Cedardale, one of our two French Immersion schools, was the only public school in the province to score top marks. While we are pleased with the result, the rankings provide only a small sliver of information about what our community values in schools.
The Fraser Institute has been compiling data from Grade 4 and Grade 7 Foundation Skills Assessment to produce reports on student achievement, in an effort to help parents decide which schools perform best academically. They produce a similar report for high schools, based on the previous year’s average examination results in Grade 10, 11 and 12 courses that include a mandatory provincial exam.
These reports reflect an old view of education: that we should compare schools and compete with one another. Our philosophy and success is based on a new model – that our schools are all connected, and should work together to improve. Collaboration — within districts, among districts and around the globe — is the key to building a stronger education system. Student learning is not about labeling winners and losers.
We appreciate the dilemma that a parent new to education — or new to a region — may be facing when they choose a school for their child, and know that it’s tempting to rely on a number in a complex world with so many choices. But educators know that using test scores to measure school performance is deeply flawed. It may provide some interesting insight at the student level, but beyond that, the measures tell us very little. It is just silly, for example, to look at one year’s scores and make broad generalizations about a school’s achievement. Cohorts of students are different each year – what is interesting to me is individual students’ progress over time.
If there was one piece of valuable information I might glean from the data, it is the small gap between our highest and lowest performing schools. While individual school performance in the West Vancouver School District goes up and down year over year, the range in results in our district is the narrowest in Metro Vancouver. This year, for example, there is only a 2.4 point gap between the highest and lowest test scores. Given the consistency in data between our schools, and over time, the message that emerges is that all West Vancouver School District schools are consistently strong achieving schools on tests in core skill areas.
So how does this link to selecting a school? The best choice for most families is the neighbourhood school. That is the choice my wife and I have made for our four kids. We know that the community connections and friends in the neighbourhood are good reasons to make a local school choice. That said, I know there is increasing choice for families. As you look at schools – whether for elementary or high school, please don’t decide based on a test score.
Instead, we ask parents to visit our schools, meet with teachers, administrators and students, learn about the school’s unique programs and opportunities, and make a decision based on the right fit for their child. In West Vancouver, we offer a broad range of programs, and with strong academic performance well in hand from one end of the district to the other, we successfully focus on providing a broad range of educational and programming options that provide a richly woven learning experience for every child.
It has been interesting to see some of the responses that I have got. People seem surprised that I would say anything, given the high standing of West Vancouver schools. It seems that I should take the approach that I am opposed to awards except for the ones we are winning.
Let there be no mistake in what I am saying – we do have outstanding public schools in our district. And being a top performer in British Columbia in reading, writing, and numeracy is reassuring. I would be thrilled to have my own children in any of our schools. And core academics are very important – as important as ever.
But schools are more complicated that simple rankings.
I am heartened that other high achieving schools and systems, like Vancouver’s Crofton House, share our view. Their head of schools Patricia Dawson was quoted in the Globe & Mail last week, “We struggle with the rankings. We greatly appreciate that the public at large, and certainly a broader parent community, looks at those rankings and puts a lot of stock in them. We do not.”
I do recognize the irony that by writing posts like this I am actually giving more attention to the rankings that I am encouraging people to give less attention.
So, I won’t blog about them again. I promise.
And my offer stands – visit our schools. You will see students doing amazing work with reading, writing, and numeracy. You will also see students learning skills to be prepared for our world – a world rich in technology, where those who can work together, solve problems, and be lifelong learners will be the ones bound for success.
I know I appreciated the opportunity to visit a couple of west van schools – and they were definitely ‘much more’ than schools focused on rankings. Great tones & discussions focused in individual student learnings. Nicely shared how the ‘rankings’ are really only a very small tile of the mosaic that makes up our public schools!
Thanks Ian. There is still a belief in some circles that to improve results the best thing one can do is “practice” the tests. I actually think results will increase by doing just the opposite. When we focus on inquiry and help young people find their passions they will be engaged in their own learning and feel ownership over what they do. And this engagement will actually translate into high achievement – even on the old standard measures. It is not an either / or proposition – we can focus on modern learning, and if some want to then assess in traditional ways our kids will still do very well.
And thanks for visiting our schools – it was a pleasure to have you in our district.
Probably why I enjoyed Who’s afraid of the big bad dragon by Yong Zhao – a nice reminder that if we want good test takers, practicing and doing tests makes sense……but……I know I want my own kids to do….different!
The best statement in this post is: ‘Our philosophy and success is based on a new model – that our schools are all connected, and should work together to improve’.
BC allows extensive parental choice which allows for personalisation of the educational programme for individual children. I had a child each in the independent and public sector and both thrived in excellent schools customised for their particular aptitudes and needs.
I am passionate about education – children’s learning and growing teachers to be exceptional practioners – no matter what sector. How I would love to see independent and public schools collaborating more closely and sharing good practice. Both sectors have so much to learn from each other for continual school improvement. We are all connected and it’s children their learning and needs which should be central, not rankings and competition.
Thank you Elizabeth. I do think a key factor that separates British Columbia is our network culture. We are far more collaborative than we are competitive and there is a general feeling of joint ownership of all children. I don’t think anyone I know takes pride in high results in their school or community if they see their neighbours struggling. It is this commitment and our efforts around equity of opportunities that help make BC a model system.
Nicely said! I’m so glad I took the time to read this post and the comments (albeit a couple of weeks late). As a parent and a teacher, I’m so glad we are focused on the whole picture and not just ‘marks’ or letter grades. If schools mirror society then we are a necessary network of caring, collaborative individuals with a shared vision of moving forward together.
I don’t look at the Rankings or my kids FSA results, but have always felt a sense of community on the playground at recess, and in the classrooms. I believe this measure of success will carry us further than a set of tests results.
Let us also not forget the inherent bias in the Fraser Institutes reporting. Big surprise that all of the top ranking schools are private schools as this is a huge part of their agenda. I strongly urge people to read Dianne Ravitch especially her latest book, Reign of Error, The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. Great insight in to the the nature and agenda behind high stakes testing.
Yes, Paul, another key part of this discussion on these particular rankings is the bias of the group producing them. I would argue, though, that regardless of the group and their political leanings and motives, school rankings do not serve our system well.
Dianne Ravtich is a good resource – I would also encourage people to follow her on twitter and read her work. While I think we are in a very different place than our friends to the south she offers a good reminder of why we need to continue to chart a different direction.
Very nice! I feel the same about my school district #37 Delta and our community. A very wise person once said, “Look where you want to go”
Thanks Melinda for the kind words. I often reference Delta and its outstanding schools – I find we have a lot in common with our commitment to look for new ways to engage students and our commitment to modern learning.
Thank you once again for a VERY incisive, rational, and passionate defense of better educational practices ! I’m astounded that thinking adults continue to fall prey to the blatant bias and out-dated educational practices the Fraser Institute perpetuates… Do I have your permission to post and excerpt on Facebook ?
Still toughing it out in under-funded, under-staffed and under-resourced Special Education programs, but keep doing it for the kids 🙂
Thank you for the very kind comments. I think people are continually drawn to ideas that are simple to understand. It is our job to remind people of the complexities of education. You are welcome to share any parts of my post – discussions about what we value in our system are always good discussions.
We have lucky kids in our province to have such dedicated teachers.