It is hard to believe it has taken my 329 posts to finally have one about Paul Simon. On the occasion of his latest album, In The Blue Light, seemed like the right time.
I should preface this by acknowledging my extreme bias. Paul Simon has been my favourite artist since elementary school. I have grown up with his music and in recent years his concerts have taken me from Oregon to Montana to Nevada.
As has been widely reported, Simon is retiring from touring this month after a final set of concerts in the United States. And just as he is retiring he has released his latest album. None of the ten songs on his album are actually brand new, they are rather new arrangements of songs (at times including new lyrics) which Simon has described as clarifying these songs, and sharing with the audience works that may have just disappeared (they are not typically in the 50 or so Paul Simon songs one hears on the radio or at concerts) but they have been given new life.
Randy Lewis described the project in the LA Times:
The project constitutes a rare instance of a pop musician engaging in a practice more common for visual artists, who sometimes return to a particular work time and again, adding a new color, shape or texture in the pursuit of some ever-evolving ideal. It’s the polar opposite of one fundamental aspect of recorded music, which freezes songs at a specific moment in time.
This quote, and really this project, got me thinking and connecting to some of what we are trying to do in education. Listening to Simon talk about the project made me think what he has doing at 76 is what we want students to do with their work in school as teenagers and pre-teenagers.
We really freeze things in time in education.
Assignments are submitted and that is that. A mark is given and everyone moves on to the next assignment.
I have written before about portfolios, capstones, passion projects and other similar experiences that pull together learning across disciplines and across time. Another theme that I have also covered is the efforts to make grading less an event and more of an ongoing conversation. These conversations are about doing what Simon has done with his music – learning does not stop when a song is written or an assignment is submitted, there is great power in the ongoing tinkering. Teaching students to be curious about re-imagining something they have written before in English, or coded before Digital Arts, or played before in band is really powerful.
I still remember a speech from my first-year History professor. He said that if we used any parts of essays we submitted in high school for our assignments in his class that was plagiarism and we could receive a zero on the assignment and in the course. More than twenty-five years later that still strikes me as odd. There should be a place for taking one‘s work and making it better. And it was my own work. There could be great value in redoing an assignment in subsequent years, taking new learning and new perspectives and applying them.
I find with my work on this blog I often take posts I have previously written and re-think them with new perspective and in a new time. When I look at some of the posts I am most proud of, many have been the ones that were published a second-time – they are a little more clear in thinking, a little more thoughtful and better express the message I intended.
If one of the greatest songwriters of our lifetime can find ways to bring greater clarity to his work, it seems we all can. Hopefully the trends continue and students in our schools will have more of these opportunities of continual refinement.
PS – You can listen to the new Paul Simon Album here for free – well worth it!
This is a way to go deeper into the meaning and see new meaning in a story, event or work of some kind. I like the example from the visual artist, Picasso, copying Velazquez’ painting Las Meninas, not once but multiple times.
It does seem the visual arts does this very well – better than most areas. Thanks for reading and commenting!
One of the structures of school that we love is the “fresh start” each year for both teachers and students. However, the downside is how quickly we forget and assume what we’ve done in the past, is just that, in the past. It would be great if we found a way to access and utilize our work, specifically for students year after year. To this end, I wonder how valuable the portfolio really is? Do students ever return to work from past years?
I definitely think we need to put structures in place to go back to look at previous work or it is forgotten. I have seen some teachers dedicate time to students selecting their favourite piece of work and revising it for inclusion in a portfolio. It is an area in the digital age that it seems we could do so much more often – with written work posted electronically, it is so simple to revise and repost. Despite the ease at which we can revise in the digital era, we largely have not changed our mindset that once one submits or publishes it is over and time to move on.
Thanks for this post, Chris. Been humming ‘Graceland’ for the past few weeks and now I know why! I will listen to the new album, thanks for the link.
Thanks Donie. Graceland is my absolute favourite album.
And sometimes when I’m falling, flying
Or tumbling in turmoil I say
Oh, so this is what she means
She means we’re bouncing into Graceland
Exactly! Here’s to tinkering, resiliency, and ‘the journey’!
[…] recent blog post by our superintendent brought up the idea of recycling or revisiting previous work, with a goal of […]