Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2025

Tomorrow night, as the Blue Jays take the field for their first World Series game in 32 years, I find myself thinking about time, how it moves, how we mark it, and how certain moments seem to hold more than others.

As I write, The Mighty Rio Grande by the band This Will Destroy You plays in the background. It’s the same haunting track often used in baseball highlight reels, the one from Moneyball that rises and swells beneath the most emotional sports moments. Somehow, it feels right.

There’s something about baseball that just hits differently. It’s never just about the game in front of us, but about all the games that came before. 

Maybe it’s the numbers, the endless statistics that let us measure generations and compare legends. Maybe it’s the pace, the slow burn of a game that unfolds in quiet moments between action. Or maybe it’s something deeper. Baseball holds a kind of memory that feels almost sacred.  It is the nostalgia made tangible, a way of reliving who we were through the game we watched and the people we shared it with. 

My first sports memory that really stuck was the 1981 Expos. I can still name their starting nine. I remember racing home at lunch to catch the end of the deciding game, and then the heartbreak as Rick Monday’s home run ended it all. Blue Monday. One of the most memorable days in Canadian baseball history, a unifying disappointment that every fan seemed to feel together.

I remember where I was for that one, just like I remember watching Joe Carter’s home run with my dad twelve years later. You don’t just remember the play; you remember the room, the people, the sound of your own voice shouting in disbelief. Baseball does that. It freezes a moment in time and lets us return to it, even decades later.

We love sports in our house, but none of our kids ever got into baseball. They found it too slow, painfully slow. Instead, they gravitated toward cheer, basketball, and track — sports with constant motion, immediate results, clear finish lines. I loved baseball growing up, but I get it. The game does feel too slow for our short-attention society. We are used to speed, to instant results, constant updates and highlights trimmed down to fifteen seconds. Baseball asks something different. It asks you to wait. To breathe. To notice.

And yet, as an educator, I see them learning the same lessons with my kids, just at a different tempo. The patience of perfecting a cheer routine through countless repetitions. The persistence of basketball practice. The slow accumulation of milliseconds shaved off a track time. The rhythm might be different, but the long game remains.

Monday night, when George Springer launched that three-run homer to send the Blue Jays past Seattle and into the World Series, Rogers Centre (I still just call it Skydome) erupted in a way we hadn’t heard in more than three decades. The excitement is infectious, sweeping through the community and the country. For those of us who grew up on the West Coast, Seattle and Toronto were our two favourite baseball teams. We would catch maybe one Jays game a week, but almost every Mariners game on local TV. Seeing those two cities battle for the pennant, knowing one had to lose, felt bittersweet and beautiful, like revisiting an old part of ourselves. The heartbreak for Seattle fans, the joy for Toronto. Both emotions familiar, both part of the game’s poetry.

Schools are a little like baseball that way. They are built on patience and presence. They reward those who keep showing up, even when the results take time. The best teachers, like the best players, understand that the season is long and the game cannot be rushed. There is a rhythm to learning that can’t be condensed into a clip or captured in a score.

Both baseball and teaching embody a culture of saying yes: yes to the slow moments between breakthroughs, yes to showing up when progress isn’t visible, yes to believing in potential that takes time to manifest. It’s saying yes to the process, not just the outcome.

We talk a lot these days about acceleration, about faster tools, quicker responses, and shorter attention spans. But maybe education, at its heart, is still about the long game. About showing up every day, doing the small things that no one notices, trusting that they will add up to something beautiful over time. About saying yes to patience when everything else demands speed.

When you are twenty and Canada’s team has just won back-to-back championships, you believe it will happen again soon. You can’t imagine that suddenly you’ll be fifty-two, that three decades will have slipped by, that you will have lived an entire life in the space between World Series appearances. The wait itself becomes a teacher. And now, caught up in the excitement that’s gripping the country, you realize how much these moments matter precisely because they are so rare.

As the Blue Jays prepare to face the defending champion Dodgers, I find myself thinking not just about the scoreboard but about that sound, the crack of the bat, the swell of the crowd, the quiet connection between father and son, teacher and student, one generation and the next.

Maybe that’s what baseball and teaching really share. They both remind us that the moments that matter most rarely happen fast. They both ask us to say yes to the waiting, to the watching, to the faithful belief that something magical might happen if we just stay present.

And maybe that’s the real lesson, that in a world obsessed with the next big thing, there’s still magic in the slow game, in the steady, human work of showing up, staying hopeful, and believing that meaning often reveals itself only when we give it time.

Over the next week, a new generation of fans will create their own frozen moments. Somewhere, a parent and child will watch together, and thirty years from now, that child will remember not just the game, but the feeling of being there, present, connected, saying yes to the slow unfolding of something larger than themselves.

Play ball.

 

 

The image at the top of this post was generated through AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »

How I draft, edit, and stay human in the loop

For years I believed my advantage was “writing.” Lately I’ve realized the real edge was not keystrokes, it was ideas, structure, and voice. AI has not erased those. If anything, it has made them more important. Rather than pretend we are still in a pen and paper world, I have been trying to model what authentic writing looks like now.

We do not protect writing by banning the tools everyone already has. We protect writing by showing what thoughtful use looks like, and by being transparent about our process.

What I am hearing, especially in humanities

Last week, a high school English teacher stopped me. “I can tell when something has been AI generated,” he said, “but I cannot tell when they have collaborated with it thoughtfully. And I do not know what to do with that.”

He is not alone. Across our humanities departments, teachers are working on the fly, trying to maintain academic integrity while recognizing that the old gatekeeping moves, ban the tool and police the draft, do not hold when every student has ChatGPT in their pocket. The fear is real. Are we farming out the exact skills we are supposed to be teaching?

I do not think the answer is choosing between integrity and innovation. It is redefining what integrity looks like when the tools have changed.

How I actually write

I still start the old fashioned way, an outline, a thesis, a few proof points, and usually one sentence I think could be the closer. From there, I treat AI like a colleague, not a ghostwriter.

  • Editing help. I ask for a clarity pass, tighten verbs, fix hedging, and check whether my headings are parallel. Here is what I actually typed for this piece: “Revise for clarity and concision. Keep a conversational, hopeful tone similar to my other blog posts. Offer two options for the opening sentence.” I kept one, rejected the other, and moved on.

  • Skeptic check. “What would a fair skeptic say after reading this” It surfaces blind spots before I hit publish.

  • Reports and formatting. For formal documents, I use AI to turn tables into charts, crunch numbers, and reshape dense text into something readable.

  • Speeches. I keep a base grad speech and add school specific stories and names. AI helps blend those elements while keeping the message consistent.

None of this replaces judgment. I accept or reject every change. If a suggestion dulls my voice, it is out. That is the standard. My judgment stays in control. I also disclose what I did, every time. A short note at the end of a post goes a long way with our community and models the behavior we ask of students.

What I encourage for classrooms and staff rooms

The most helpful shift has been moving from “Do not use AI” to “Show your decisions.”

  • Model, then mirror. I demo my messy paragraph, ask AI for a clarity edit, then accept or reject in real time while explaining why. Students should bring their draft, try the same process, and compare choices.

  • Assess the thinking. Rubrics weight claims, evidence, organization, and audience impact, not who placed the comma.

  • Make the process visible. Version histories in Docs or Word, plus brief process notes that list tools used, prompts asked, and choices made, make learning visible and deter abdication of thinking.

  • Cite the workflow. Not to catch people out, but to name steps we can teach.

Guardrails that keep the work honest

  • No blank page outsourcing. Start with your outline, thesis, or key points.

  • Ask precise questions. “Cut 10 percent without losing meaning. Keep my conversational tone.”

  • Verify facts. If AI offers a claim, check it before it lands in public.

  • Always disclose. If a tool shaped meaning or form, say how.

Is this just cheating with better branding

I have never believed collaboration was cheating. When I wrote a newspaper column, my dad, a retired English teacher, was my unofficial copy desk. He proofread, edited, and offered suggestions on every draft. The byline was still mine because the ideas, voice, and final choices were mine.

Tricia Buckley, and before her Sharon Pierce and Deb Podurgiel, all staff in West Vancouver Schools, have read every blog post here before they were published and provided feedback.

AI sits in that same category for me, a helper, not a ghostwriter, and always subject to human judgment. What changed with AI is speed, scale, and availability. I can get feedback at 11 p.m., run ten drafts in twenty minutes, and the tool is always on. What did not change is my judgment, my responsibility for choices and my name on the work.

If the goal is proving you can type unaided, then yes, tools muddy the waters. Our goal in schools is thinking for real audiences. We have always used supports, outlines, spellcheckers, style guides, writing partners, rubrics and colleagues. The standard should be integrity and evidence of learning, not tool abstinence.

Equity

AI is a ramp, not a shortcut.

It helps stuck writers get moving, the student staring at a blank page who needs a sentence to react to, or the English language learner who can articulate ideas verbally but struggles with syntax. AI can generate that first sentence, and suddenly the student has something to revise, reject, or build on. For strong writers, it is a way to go deeper, test alternate structures, get a skeptic to read, or polish a conclusion without losing momentum.

The equity move is not banning tools for everyone. It is teaching how to use them responsibly, and ensuring access to good instruction is not the new dividing line. When we teach tool literacy, we level up. When we ban tools students already have, we make the learning invisible.

Prompts that actually help

  • Clarity pass: “Revise for clarity and concision. Keep a conversational, hopeful tone. Offer two options for the opening sentence.”

  • Skeptic lens: “List the strongest fair minded critiques of this piece and one concrete improvement for each.”

  • Structure check: “Are these headings parallel? Tell me how to fix them without changing the ideas.”

  • Audience flip: “Rewrite the conclusion as guidance to parents in about 120 words.”

  • Report polish: “Turn this table into three plain language insights and a simple chart title. Flag any numbers that look inconsistent.”

What I tell our community

  • We are pro-writing and pro-truth. We will use modern tools and we will say when we did.

  • We value voice. Your voice should be recognizable across drafts and tools.

  • We lead with learning. If a tool helps learning, we will teach it. If it replaces thinking, we will not.

If you want more

Last week I facilitated a Hot Topic discussion, “The Future of Writing in an AI World,” at the Canadian K12 School Leadership Summit on Generative AI

North Star

I can spend my time lamenting that writing once felt like my competitive edge, or I can double down on the edge that still matters, clear thinking, vivid stories and the courage to be transparent about how we work. That is the blended human and AI writing world I want to model for students and staff.

The teacher who stopped me in the hallway was right to be uncertain. We are all figuring this out in real time. I would rather figure it out in the open, and model a messy and honest process, than pretend the tools do not exist.

AI transparency note: I drafted this post myself, then used ChatGPT and Claude for a clarity edit and a skeptic read. I accepted some wording suggestions and rejected others to preserve voice. The image at the top of the post was created through a series of prompts using Claude.

 
 

.

Read Full Post »

Published on World Teachers’ Day

At 22, I thought I knew what teaching would be like. I had studied pedagogy, completed practicums, and felt ready to change the world one classroom at a time. What I had not anticipated was how much the people around me would change me first.

I was often the youngest person in the staff room by a decade or more. While my peers from university were figuring out their careers alongside people their own age, I was learning from colleagues who had children older than me. It was not a disadvantage. It was a gift I am only now beginning to fully understand.

I became a teacher at 22, a principal at 29 and a superintendent at 36. Moving through positions early meant my professional circles were often made up of people 10 to 20 years older than me. As a young teacher, my closest colleagues were in their 30s and 40s. As a young principal, I looked to mentors in their 40s and 50s. And as a young superintendent, I built friendships with leaders in their 50s and 60s. These people, so many of them, are among the most important influences in my life.

And now, here comes the cruelty of age. My mentors retire. They slow down. They get sick. Too many of them die.

This is, of course, part of life. It happens in all professions, not just ours. But at almost 52, I feel it more acutely. Those I looked up to, those I built my professional world around, are now mostly in their 60s, 70s and beyond. The losses are sharper. The silences more noticeable.

I am fortunate to have incredible colleagues now, including our current senior team in West Vancouver. They inspire me every day and make the work deeply fulfilling. Yet I also find myself often thinking of those who came before me. I miss them dearly.

And this is where I find hope. Just as I was shaped by those ahead of me, I now find myself in the position to be that colleague and mentor for others. The cycle continues. While I grieve the loss of those who guided me, I also take comfort in knowing their influence lives on in the way I lead and support others.

There is something profound about realizing you have become the person others look to for guidance. Not because you have figured everything out, but because you carry the wisdom of those who came before you. Their voices still echo in the decisions I make, the advice I give and the way I approach both triumph and crisis.

I think about the young educators in our district now, many of them closer in age to my four kids than to me. When they seek advice or simply need someone to listen, I hear my old mentors speaking through me. Their patience, their perspective their quiet confidence in the face of uncertainty—all of it lives on.

This is how we honour the people who shaped us. Not through monuments or memorials, but by becoming worthy of the investment they made in us. And perhaps, if we are lucky, by being worth the investment that someone younger is willing to make in learning from us.

The circle does not break. It just keeps getting wider.

On this World Teachers’ Day, I am reminded that the greatest legacy of teaching is not what we accomplish alone, but how we live on in those who follow us.

And one more link – this post highlights some of my favourite World Teachers’ Day posts from previous years.  

The image at the top of this post was generated through AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »