Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘SD45’ Category

This is Post #500. Writing that sentence feels both surreal and deeply satisfying. More than anything, these posts have taught me that leadership and life are sustained by one simple word: yes.

That yes began more than fifteen years ago, uncertain and small. When I pressed “publish” on my very first entry, I had no sense of where it might lead. Would anyone read it? Would I have anything worth saying after a handful of posts? Would the blog simply fade out, like so many others? And yet, here we are. 499 posts later.

The Early Yes

At the beginning, the simple act of writing was an experiment. By the time I reached 150 posts, I reflected that

Blogging has helped me become very comfortable with who I am … it has forced me to be specific about ideas, pushed me to share publicly, and given me a regular vehicle to reflect and refine my thinking. Blogging is different; it is the difference between telling and engaging, and I look forward to engaging in the next 150.

That shift, from telling to engaging, was one of my first and most important yesses.

At 150, I was already sharing advice for others who wanted to start: be clear about what you will and won’t write about … write for yourself, not for what others may want … think in blog posts … be a storyteller. Our schools are full of amazing stories waiting to be told. It was a reminder that blogging isn’t about volume; it’s about voice.

The Hard but Important Yes

Here’s what I didn’t know at the beginning: how difficult it would be to keep saying yes.

At 400, I wrote:

When I started blogging, I never really thought about how it would end. And I don’t think I fully knew that it was actually hard to write regularly. Anyone who tells you blogging is easy is lying! But most important things are not easy.

There were weeks when the words wouldn’t come. Stretches when I questioned whether I had anything new to say. Moments when the pressure of other responsibilities made the blog feel like one more obligation rather than an opportunity. Even at the 10-year mark, when I joked with George Couros that we might be “two of the last bloggers out there,” I wondered if persistence was just stubbornness by another name.

But then someone would stop me at a conference to share how a post resonated with them. Or an email would arrive from a teacher I had never met, describing how an idea sparked something in their practice. Or a comment would appear on the blog itself: thoughtful, challenging, extending the thinking beyond what I had offered. And the yes would return, renewed not by my own certainty but by the community that had quietly formed around these posts.

The persistence of yes, I have learned, is not a solo endeavor. It is sustained by every reader who takes the time to engage, whether directly on the blog, through social media, or in those wonderful in-person moments when someone says, “I read your blog.” Those four words matter more than you might know.

The Yes Behind the Yes

What I haven’t said yet is that I never wrote alone.

Before there was a blog, there was a newspaper column. And before every column went to print, it went to my dad. He was my first editor, catching errors, questioning word choices, and making everything a little bit better. When I started the blog in 2010, I had just officially become a superintendent. My dad was proud of that. He saw me settle into the role, saw the blog take shape, saw the first few years of posts. He passed away in August 2014, and I think of him often when I write. Some habits, once formed by people we love, thankfully stay with us.

When I started this blog in 2010, newspapers were still flourishing. I had grown up reading them, writing for them, learning from the columnists who made sense of the world in 800 words at a time. Over these 500 posts, I have watched that world shrink. Papers have closed. Bureaus have emptied. The people who made a living thinking in public, holding institutions accountable, telling the stories of communities, have largely moved on or been moved out. I miss newspapers, but more than that, I miss the people who wrote for them. Blogging is not the same thing, but in some small way it feels like an attempt to keep that spirit alive: a place to think publicly, to wrestle with ideas, to believe that writing for an audience, however small, still matters.

Since my dad, others have quietly taken up the work of editing. Tricia Buckley, and before her Sharon Pierce and Deb Podurgiel, have read every single post before it was published. Every one. They catch what I miss, sharpen what I muddle, and make this space better than I could make it alone. To write for 500 posts is one thing. To have colleagues willing to read 500 drafts is something else entirely.

I am also grateful to Jay Goldman, editor of School Administrator Magazine. Over the years, Jay and the magazine have repurposed a number of my posts and accepted other pieces of writing. What begins as a post for this small corner of the internet sometimes finds its way to a broader audience. That reach, and the connections it creates, has mattered more than I expected.

And then there are the bloggers who showed me what this could be. In the early days, I had a blogroll that was inspiring. I would read Dean Shareski, or Will Richardson, or David Warlick and be excited. The world of web 2.0 was booming and each post I read was opening me up to new ideas and a new world I was trying to understand. George Couros has been both friend and model for what it means to tell the story of education with optimism and persistence. More recently, I have found kinship with a small community of BC superintendent bloggers. Jordan Tinney and Kevin Godden have since retired, but for a time we kept each other going. Now it’s mostly Dave Eberwein and me. I also appreciate how Cari Wilson and Sandra-Lynn Shortall in West Vancouver blog regularly and keep the blog community humming.

The Yes in Ideas

Looking back across 499 posts, I am struck by something unexpected: the topics have changed dramatically, but the underlying themes have remained remarkably consistent.

Yes to innovation with curiosity: From early posts on social media in classrooms and mobile devices to today’s reflections on generative AI, the tools change but the thread remains: lean into change with curiosity, not fear.

Yes to mentorship that outlives us: I arrived in Mrs. Caffrey’s Grade 2 class unable to read and without confidence. I had her for Grade 2, Grade 3, and Grade 4, and left at the end of those three years a completely different student. I have written about her many times over the years because she represents something I believe deeply: a single teacher can change a life trajectory. From World Teachers’ Day tributes to stories of colleagues who shaped my early career, I have come to see mentorship as how yes persists beyond any single person, passed forward voice to voice, generation to generation. And now, at 52, I find myself on the other side of that exchange, trying to be for others what so many were for me.

Yes to well-being as core, not extra: Posts on physical literacy, wellness, and school sports remind me that joy, movement, and balance are not optional. They are essentials for students and leaders alike.

Yes to family and wonder as part of leadership: Interwoven among leadership reflections are personal stories: concerts with my wife, milestones with my kids, anecdotes from sports and community. Leadership is human work. Yes is sustained when it includes wonder, humour, and gratitude.

The Yes that Learns

Over the years, I have admitted when I was wrong. I have revised posts, shifted my stance, and acknowledged that what once seemed certain might now be more complicated. The persistence of yes doesn’t mean refusing to change. It is about holding fast to values while letting strategies evolve. It is about being willing to write in pencil, not ink.

The Yes Forward

So what does yes look like after 500 posts?

It looks like continuing to model thoughtful, transparent use of AI in schools, choosing curiosity over compliance, and reminding ourselves that technology should expand opportunity, not shrink relationships.

It looks like protecting public education as a place of hope, belonging, and possibility, even when the winds of politics blow cold.

It looks like saying yes to wonder, to the small joys that keep cynicism at bay.

It looks like believing, still, that education can and must be better tomorrow than it was yesterday.

After 500 posts, here is my promise: I will keep saying yes to relationships before technology, to students before systems, to hope before cynicism. Because public education still deserves our most persistent yes.

The Power of People

As I’ve been rereading old posts in preparation for this one, I keep being struck by the same thing: the people. Name after name, story after story. I am reminded of how many good people we have in West Vancouver, and more broadly across education. People who care deeply, who show up for one another, who make this work meaningful. I am lucky to be part of this community.

The Invitation

So here, at Post #500, I leave you with the same question that has guided me since the beginning:

What, in your corner of education, still deserves a persistent yes?

For me, the answer is unchanged: a stubborn belief in public education as a place of hope, possibility, and human connection.

When I pressed “publish” on that first post, I didn’t know if anyone would read it. 499 posts later, I still don’t know exactly where this is going. But I know the question is still worth asking, and the yes is still worth emphatically saying. This is not just persistence. This is the persistence of yes.

The image at the top of this post was generated through AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »

Here we are again. A final post for calendar year 16 on Culture of Yes.

As I close out another year, I find myself in an unexpected place. This was the easiest year of writing in the 16 years I’ve been doing this. Not because the topics were simple or the world less complicated, but because I found myself needing to write. It never felt like a chore. In a year where it would be easy to drown in bad news and uncertainty, I chose optimism. I chose curiosity. I chose to keep saying yes. And if I go back to my word for the year – I chose to thrive.

If you are wondering what you might have missed, here are the previous years Top 3 lists: 2024 (here) 2023 (here) 2022 (here) 2021 (here) 2020 (here) 2019 (here) 2018 (here) 2017 (here) 2016 (here) 2015 (here) 2014 (here) 2013 (here) 2012 (here), 2011 (here) and 2010 (here)

You know the format by now. Grab your beverage of choice and join me as I look back on what made 2025 special.

Top 3 “Culture of Yes” Blog Posts which have generated the most traffic this year:

These three posts represent so much of what I think about in my work. All Means All is at the core of everything we do in West Vancouver. It is not a slogan; it is a commitment. The graduation post has become a fairly regular share, and it forces me to think about what really matters for young people heading out into the world. And the AI post speaks to a tension I keep exploring: how technology might actually help us be more human, not less. I wrote a lot on AI this year, and it was interesting to see the most popular post was one about AI leading to less technology use.

Top 3 Blog Posts That Were My Personal Favourites:

The posts that mean the most to me are often the more personal ones. Writing about Paul Simon let me explore a relationship with music that has spanned more than 40 years. The mentors piece was hard to write but necessary as I am beginning to feel my age in this work. And the Blue Jays post reminded me why I love using sports as a lens to think about learning and life. That was quite the run for the Jays!

Top 3 Shifts in BC Education in 2025:

  • The focus on 0 to 5 and the ongoing integration of childcare and K-12 as one system
  • A renewed emphasis on early literacy and knowing where our young learners are so we can adjust quickly and nimbly
  • A steadiness that allowed the work to get done

I want to dwell on that third one for a moment. There was not a lot of drama in BC education this year. And that is a good thing. When the system is steady, educators can focus on what matters most: the students in front of them. I look at other jurisdictions across North America and they seem constantly distracted from the business of learning. Steadiness does not make headlines, but it makes a difference.

Top 3 Questions I’m Carrying Into 2026:

  • What do we need to stop doing so we can focus on what truly matters?
  • How do we prepare students for an AI-shaped future without losing our humanity?
  • What does leadership look like when certainty is no longer available?

As I wrote in my June post on the power of questions (here), I’m increasingly convinced that progress in education doesn’t come from having better answers, but from asking better questions. These three will quietly shape my thinking, decisions, and conversations as I step into 2026.

Top 3 Things I Was Wrong About:

  • I thought ethical discussions on AI would be more mainstream by now
  • I never thought Canada would come down with Blue Jays fever
  • I did not see my own writing renaissance coming

On AI ethics, I expected 2025 to be the year we would see more public conversation about the big questions. What does this mean for work? For creativity? For what it means to be human? Those conversations are happening, but not at the scale I anticipated. Maybe 2026.

The Blue Jays World Series excitement this year caught me completely off guard. I wrote about it, and it connected with people in ways I did not expect. There is something about baseball that still captures the imagination.

And the writing renaissance? I genuinely did not see it coming. After nearly 500 posts, I thought the well might be running dry. Instead, this year I found more to say than ever. I needed to write. That was a gift.

Top 3 Things I Am Getting Worse At As I Age:

  • Public speaking
  • Seeing stuff
  • Connecting with new staff

This is a new category, and I think an important one. Humility matters.

Public speaking used to feel effortless. Now I feel the rust. I am not as smooth as I was 20 years ago, and I notice it.  I am conscious now that I am not as good as I once was.  My glasses have become a constant companion, though I am still fighting that battle.  Far too often I am using my phone to take a photo of text to enlarge and read.   And connecting with new teachers who are younger than my own children? I can feel my age in those conversations sometimes. It takes more intentionality than it used to. Speaking and connecting are definitely two areas I can work on in 2026.

Top 3 AI Tools for Education (The Migration to the Big Players):

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini and CoPilot (tied for third)

Last year I wrote about niche AI tools. This year I find myself using fewer specialized tools and relying more on the big players. Co-Pilot, Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT have become my core toolkit. They are more powerful, more integrated, and constantly improving. The niche tools still have their place, but the migration to the majors has been real for me this year.

Top 3 Presentations That Pushed My Thinking:

  • Speaking to teachers in Beijing
  • Sharing AI thinking with Safe Schools Coordinators
  • Let’s Talk Science

The Beijing presentation stays with me. Their issues are our issues. The questions teachers ask in China about AI, about engagement, about preparing students for an uncertain future are the same questions we wrestle with here. It was a powerful reminder that education’s challenges are global.

Safe Schools Coordinators pushed me to see AI from a different perspective. When you talk about AI with people focused on safety, you think differently about risks and responsibilities.

And my Let’s Talk Science presentation late in the year forced me to take stock of where West Vancouver is right now. Sometimes you need an external audience to clarify your own thinking.

Top 3 Authors Who Pushed My Thinking in 2025:

  • Yong Zhao
  • Peter Diamandis
  • Adam Grant 

Yong Zhao continues to challenge my assumptions about what education could be. I got a look at a new book (here) he has coming out in 2026, and he is pushing again!  Peter Diamandis (here) got me thinking about longevity, which connects to so much of how I approach my own health and habits. And Adam Grant? He pushes my thinking (here) even when I push back. That is what good authors do.

Top 3 AI Connections I Always Recommend:

If you want to follow smart people thinking carefully about AI in education, start with these four. They are generous with their ideas and always worth reading.

Top 3 Blogs I Never Miss (Even After All These Years):

The edu blogosphere is not what it was in 2011 to 2014, but these passionate educators keep writing, and I keep reading. There is something to be said for people who have been at this for years and still find things worth saying. They inspire me to keep going. 

Top 3 Concerts I Saw This Year:

  • Paul Simon (multiple locations)
  • Andy Grammer
  • AC/DC

Paul Simon is not really retired yet, and I am grateful for every chance to see him. I have written about what his music means to me, and those concerts remain a highlight of any year. Andy Grammer brought pure joy. And AC/DC? Sometimes you just need to rock.

Top 3 Travel Moments of the Year:

  • 25th Wedding Anniversary at Niagara Falls
  • Running the 45th Anniversary Terry Fox Run on Confederation Bridge with my two sons
  • The VK Basketball Summer Circuit (Phoenix, LA, Montreal, Las Vegas, Chicago)

Yes, Niagara Falls for a 25th anniversary is a cliché. I do not care. It was great.

The Terry Fox Run from New Brunswick to PEI with 10,000 people on the Confederation Bridge with my sons will stay with me forever. There is something about running alongside your children for a cause that matters that defies easy description.

And the VK Basketball Circuit hit year 10 this summer. Phoenix, LA, Montreal, Las Vegas, Chicago. One more summer left with a playing age daughter. I am not taking it for granted. For the last 10 years I have spent my summers with amazing young athletes and coaches who are some of my very best friends.  It is so much fun!

Top 3 Social Media Follows That Keep Me Focused:

These three help me stay disciplined. Discipline is key. In a world of endless distraction, I need voices that remind me to do the work.

Top 3 Things I Tried To Do More Of This Year:

  • Say no to stuff that was not something I was passionate about
  • Say yes to AI and athletics, two areas where I think I can really add value
  • Be a better mentor and reach out more to colleagues I think I can assist

Saying no is hard for someone who writes a blog called Culture of Yes. But saying no to the wrong things creates space to say yes to the right ones. I need to still cull some things I do from my professional life that are time and energy drags and add little value.   AI and athletics are where I can contribute most right now. And mentorship? I want to be for others what my mentors were for me.

Top 3 Daily Streaks I Still Have Going:

  • Running 5 outdoor km a day (just passed 1,800 days, looking forward to 2,000 on July 9, 2026)
  • 10,000 steps a day (now at 12 years)
  • Daily photo posting to Instagram (January 1st will be 10 years)

The streaks continue. They are about discipline and consistency, qualities I believe are in short supply and more important than ever. The running streak crossing 1,800 days feels significant. 2,000 is on the horizon.

Top 3 Artists for Me According to Spotify This Year:

  • Paul Simon
  • Simon and Garfunkel
  • The Beatles

Not much to see here. For all the things that change in the world, my music tastes are not one of them. I am still my parents’ musical loves.  Spotify gives you an age based on my music – I came in at 73 years old.

Top 3 Photos From This Past Year That Make Me Smile:

With Nick and Zack on the Confederation Bridge

Paul Simon at the Massey Hall in Toronto

Learning alongside K students at West Bay Elementary School

I could easily pick so many others. I love going through my photos from each day to look back on the year. A collection of work, family, and friends. Scrolling through them will always make me smile.

Final Thoughts

As I wrap up my reflections on 2025, I keep coming back to the word that has guided this blog from the beginning: yes.

Yes to curiosity. Yes to optimism. Yes to the belief that education can be better and that the people in it are working hard to make it so.

This year brought me a writing renaissance I did not expect. It reminded me that even after 30 years in education, there is still so much to learn, so much to say, and so much to be excited about.

Early in the new year, I will hit a milestone: 500 posts on Culture of Yes. I did not know when I started this blog that it would become such a constant in my life. But here we are, and I am grateful.

To all of you who have read, shared, and engaged with these posts throughout the year: thank you. Your reflections, challenges, and encouragement fuel my writing and inspire my thinking.

Here is to stepping into 2026 with the same energy, passion, and hope that have carried us through this year. Here is to staying curious as I finish my 30th year in education.

Happy holidays, and see you in the new year.

The image at the top of this post was generated through AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »

How I draft, edit, and stay human in the loop

For years I believed my advantage was “writing.” Lately I’ve realized the real edge was not keystrokes, it was ideas, structure, and voice. AI has not erased those. If anything, it has made them more important. Rather than pretend we are still in a pen and paper world, I have been trying to model what authentic writing looks like now.

We do not protect writing by banning the tools everyone already has. We protect writing by showing what thoughtful use looks like, and by being transparent about our process.

What I am hearing, especially in humanities

Last week, a high school English teacher stopped me. “I can tell when something has been AI generated,” he said, “but I cannot tell when they have collaborated with it thoughtfully. And I do not know what to do with that.”

He is not alone. Across our humanities departments, teachers are working on the fly, trying to maintain academic integrity while recognizing that the old gatekeeping moves, ban the tool and police the draft, do not hold when every student has ChatGPT in their pocket. The fear is real. Are we farming out the exact skills we are supposed to be teaching?

I do not think the answer is choosing between integrity and innovation. It is redefining what integrity looks like when the tools have changed.

How I actually write

I still start the old fashioned way, an outline, a thesis, a few proof points, and usually one sentence I think could be the closer. From there, I treat AI like a colleague, not a ghostwriter.

  • Editing help. I ask for a clarity pass, tighten verbs, fix hedging, and check whether my headings are parallel. Here is what I actually typed for this piece: “Revise for clarity and concision. Keep a conversational, hopeful tone similar to my other blog posts. Offer two options for the opening sentence.” I kept one, rejected the other, and moved on.

  • Skeptic check. “What would a fair skeptic say after reading this” It surfaces blind spots before I hit publish.

  • Reports and formatting. For formal documents, I use AI to turn tables into charts, crunch numbers, and reshape dense text into something readable.

  • Speeches. I keep a base grad speech and add school specific stories and names. AI helps blend those elements while keeping the message consistent.

None of this replaces judgment. I accept or reject every change. If a suggestion dulls my voice, it is out. That is the standard. My judgment stays in control. I also disclose what I did, every time. A short note at the end of a post goes a long way with our community and models the behavior we ask of students.

What I encourage for classrooms and staff rooms

The most helpful shift has been moving from “Do not use AI” to “Show your decisions.”

  • Model, then mirror. I demo my messy paragraph, ask AI for a clarity edit, then accept or reject in real time while explaining why. Students should bring their draft, try the same process, and compare choices.

  • Assess the thinking. Rubrics weight claims, evidence, organization, and audience impact, not who placed the comma.

  • Make the process visible. Version histories in Docs or Word, plus brief process notes that list tools used, prompts asked, and choices made, make learning visible and deter abdication of thinking.

  • Cite the workflow. Not to catch people out, but to name steps we can teach.

Guardrails that keep the work honest

  • No blank page outsourcing. Start with your outline, thesis, or key points.

  • Ask precise questions. “Cut 10 percent without losing meaning. Keep my conversational tone.”

  • Verify facts. If AI offers a claim, check it before it lands in public.

  • Always disclose. If a tool shaped meaning or form, say how.

Is this just cheating with better branding

I have never believed collaboration was cheating. When I wrote a newspaper column, my dad, a retired English teacher, was my unofficial copy desk. He proofread, edited, and offered suggestions on every draft. The byline was still mine because the ideas, voice, and final choices were mine.

Tricia Buckley, and before her Sharon Pierce and Deb Podurgiel, all staff in West Vancouver Schools, have read every blog post here before they were published and provided feedback.

AI sits in that same category for me, a helper, not a ghostwriter, and always subject to human judgment. What changed with AI is speed, scale, and availability. I can get feedback at 11 p.m., run ten drafts in twenty minutes, and the tool is always on. What did not change is my judgment, my responsibility for choices and my name on the work.

If the goal is proving you can type unaided, then yes, tools muddy the waters. Our goal in schools is thinking for real audiences. We have always used supports, outlines, spellcheckers, style guides, writing partners, rubrics and colleagues. The standard should be integrity and evidence of learning, not tool abstinence.

Equity

AI is a ramp, not a shortcut.

It helps stuck writers get moving, the student staring at a blank page who needs a sentence to react to, or the English language learner who can articulate ideas verbally but struggles with syntax. AI can generate that first sentence, and suddenly the student has something to revise, reject, or build on. For strong writers, it is a way to go deeper, test alternate structures, get a skeptic to read, or polish a conclusion without losing momentum.

The equity move is not banning tools for everyone. It is teaching how to use them responsibly, and ensuring access to good instruction is not the new dividing line. When we teach tool literacy, we level up. When we ban tools students already have, we make the learning invisible.

Prompts that actually help

  • Clarity pass: “Revise for clarity and concision. Keep a conversational, hopeful tone. Offer two options for the opening sentence.”

  • Skeptic lens: “List the strongest fair minded critiques of this piece and one concrete improvement for each.”

  • Structure check: “Are these headings parallel? Tell me how to fix them without changing the ideas.”

  • Audience flip: “Rewrite the conclusion as guidance to parents in about 120 words.”

  • Report polish: “Turn this table into three plain language insights and a simple chart title. Flag any numbers that look inconsistent.”

What I tell our community

  • We are pro-writing and pro-truth. We will use modern tools and we will say when we did.

  • We value voice. Your voice should be recognizable across drafts and tools.

  • We lead with learning. If a tool helps learning, we will teach it. If it replaces thinking, we will not.

If you want more

Last week I facilitated a Hot Topic discussion, “The Future of Writing in an AI World,” at the Canadian K12 School Leadership Summit on Generative AI

North Star

I can spend my time lamenting that writing once felt like my competitive edge, or I can double down on the edge that still matters, clear thinking, vivid stories and the courage to be transparent about how we work. That is the blended human and AI writing world I want to model for students and staff.

The teacher who stopped me in the hallway was right to be uncertain. We are all figuring this out in real time. I would rather figure it out in the open, and model a messy and honest process, than pretend the tools do not exist.

AI transparency note: I drafted this post myself, then used ChatGPT and Claude for a clarity edit and a skeptic read. I accepted some wording suggestions and rejected others to preserve voice. The image at the top of the post was created through a series of prompts using Claude.

 
 

.

Read Full Post »

For the past few years, I have ended each school year with a list post, one item for every year I’ve worked in education. It’s become a bit of a tradition, a way to pause, reflect and take stock before heading into summer.

In 2022, I wrote about 26 teachers and the 26 lessons they taught me.
In 2023, it was 27 ways schools are better now than when I started.
And in 2024, I shared 28 reasons I still love teaching.

This year marks my 29th in education, and I have found myself in a different space, one filled less with answers and more with questions.

Some are big and philosophical. Others are daily dilemmas. All of them keep me curious, grounded and sometimes even uncomfortable (in the best way).

After nearly three decades in classrooms and schools, I have discovered something unexpected: the more I learn, the more comfortable I am with not knowing.

Where I once rushed to have answers, I now find myself lingering in questions.

Experience has taught me that the best conversations that actually move us forward often begin not with someone declaring what is right, but with someone brave enough to wonder what is possible.

Asking questions keeps me curious, not certain and invites nuance over neat and tidy solutions. They are invitations for dialogue, not assertions disguised as inquiries. In a field where we are constantly pressed to have all the answers for our students, I am learning there is profound wisdom in modeling intellectual humility, in showing that the most important thing we can do is keep asking better questions.

So here they are: 29 questions I am still asking about education.

  1. What do students remember ten years after they leave us and how can we build more moments that stay with them ?

  2. How do we ensure we are preparing students for their rapidly changing future rather than the education system we experienced?

  3. How do we measure success in ways that actually matter to all students, not just those who fit traditional molds?

  4. What is the perfect balance between structure and freedom in a school day?

  5. How do we make professional learning as engaging as the best classroom lesson?

  6. How might we reframe ‘failure’ as a necessary part of learning and innovation in our schools?

  7. Can AI make education more human—or will it just keep writing emails  that are more diplomatic than we’d ever be?

  8. What is the role of joy in academic achievement?

  9. How do we create schools where every adult loves coming to work?

  10. Are we brave enough to stop doing things just because we have always done them?

  11. What should a report card really tell a parent?

  12. How can we build systems that support innovation without burning people out?

  13. What happens when students lead the learning?

  14. Why do some of our best students struggle after graduation and what can we do about it?

  15. What if extracurriculars were seen as essential, not extra?

  16. How can we get better at truly listening to students?

  17. What would it take to fully integrate physical literacy into our academic priorities?

  18. Is grading helping or hurting learning?

  19. How do we support staff to be both bold and well and not just surviving on caffeine, calendar invites and good intentions?

  20. What do families really want from schools and are we asking enough?

  21. What makes a school feel safe emotionally, not just physically?

  22. How do we teach digital citizenship without sounding like someone’s uncle trying to explain TikTok?

  23. What messages are our systems and structures sending to students, and how do they align with what we say we value?

  24. How do we honour our most experienced teachers while still challenging them to grow?

  25. How can we make educational leadership less lonely?

  26. What does it look like when we build systems where every student regardless of background, cultural identity or learning needs truly belongs and can succeed on their own terms?

  27. What is the role of wonder in learning and how do we protect it?

  28. When will conference organizers take me up on my suggestion to stop serving meals and just handout $15 gift cards for the local mall food court?

  29. How do we keep the humanity at the centre as education evolves through rapid technological and social change?

These questions don’t have easy answers, and that is exactly the point. In a world racing toward efficiency and automation, schools must remain gloriously, stubbornly human.

The questions that matter most aren’t about systems or standards, they’re about the people in front of us, the relationships we build, and the humanity we nurture together.

Here’s to year 30. Let’s keep wondering. Let’s keep being human.

In the creation of this post I used Chat GPT and Claude as work partners – helping refine my ideas and questions.  The image at the top of this post is also created by AI.

Read Full Post »

I love graduation season. 

I did a quick tally the other day and realized I have been to nearly 50 graduation ceremonies since I arrived in West Vancouver 18 years ago. Most years, I make it to at least three events. Grad ceremonies are fascinating—they’re like time capsules, reflecting the mood of the moment, the spirit of the school and the culture of the community.

And let’s be honest: if anyone is still talking about the superintendent’s speech a week later, something probably went horribly wrong. I know nobody shows up to graduation eagerly anticipating the superintendent’s address. That said, I do try to tailor each speech to the school, the students and the moment we are in. While I tend to carry a few themes across schools, each one gets its own personal touches.

So with that, I wanted to share my words to the Class of 2025. Below is the speech I gave at West Vancouver Secondary, and I’ve also posted the versions I delivered at Rockridge and Sentinel (Sentinel’s grad is actually this coming weekend so at this point, this is really just my draft speech for their grad).

To all our graduates—congratulations!


Good evening,

Staff, proud parents, and most importantly the West Vancouver Secondary’s graduating class of 2025.

Tonight is a moment — a celebration, a transition, a threshold. As Superintendent of West Vancouver Schools, I am honoured to bring greetings on behalf of our entire educational community;  the 7,500 students and over 1,000 staff across our district. And I am proud to be here tonight with so many of the key adults in your school lives. It is great to be with Mr. Rauh, who reminds me often of what a remarkable group you are.

Graduation is a milestone, but also a mirror. It reflects the late nights and early mornings, the exams and the performances, the setbacks and the successes. And more than that it reflects how far you’ve come, and the kind of people you’ve become.

Over the past thirteen years, your generation has lived through global pandemics, climate emergencies, and massive technological transformation. This past year, AI stopped being something out of science fiction and started showing up in your classrooms and maybe even your homework folders. The world you’re entering is fast-moving, complex, and yes, uncertain. But you are not unprepared.

You’ve learned to adapt, to speak up, to think critically and care deeply. You’ve challenged systems. You’ve advocated for equity, climate action, mental health, and reconciliation — not as optional topics, but as urgent responsibilities. You’ve pushed us, the adults, to do better.

At WVSS, you’ve also been part of a school that doesn’t just teach content — it builds character. You’ve learned from teachers who saw education not as a job, but as a calling. From the stage at Kay Meek to the gym, the robotics room to the home ec classes, the IB classroom to the cafeteria, your education has been rooted in connection.

Because while the details of quadratic equations and historical treaties may fade, how you felt in this place, and how you made others feel that endures.

Let me say this clearly: public education matters. It is the great equalizer, the foundation of democracy, and the beating heart of our communities. I want to thank your parents for choosing public schools and thank you for making this one better.

No pressure but West Van Secondary grads tend to make a mark. Whether it’s in medicine or media, business or the arts, advocacy or science  you are difference-makers. And the world is ready for your difference.

So as you graduate this June and move out into the world, here’s what I hope you’ll carry:

– Stay curious. Curiosity is the antidote to fear and the spark behind every breakthrough.
– Stay kind. The world doesn’t need more noise — it needs more empathy.
– Stay grounded. Your values are your compass — don’t trade them for convenience.

And remember: you are not alone. You are part of a legacy, a community, and a future still being written.

Congratulations, Class of 2025. We believe in you. We’re cheering for you. And we can’t wait to see what you do next.

Thank you.

The image at the top of this post was created through a Chat GPT prompt.

Read Full Post »

Every spring in schools, one of the most anticipated emails arrives: our principal and vice-principal appointments for the fall. This post offers a window into how these important decisions are made—and why they matter so deeply to our school communities.

It is a tradition that always stirs interest. People read closely, scroll quickly to find their school, and immediately text colleagues: “Did you see the changes?” We have just shared our latest list in West Vancouver, with some leaders stepping into new schools, others taking on promotions and many continuing their important work right where they are.

These moves are never made lightly. There is both an art and a science to placing school leaders. It is one of the most important decisions we make each year—and probably the one we spend the most time thinking about.

Why Principals and Vice-Principals Move (or Stay)

We often hear, “Why are they moving? They just got here!” And other times, “They’ve been here forever—what’s next for them?” There’s no perfect formula. Some leaders stay in one school for over a decade. Others move after just a few years. Both can be the right call.

Yes, I’ve worked in a district before where all administrators were moved every five years. That’s one model. But considering I have been in the same district office chair for 15 years now, it might feel a little rich for me to set strict term limits for everyone else.

What I do believe in is fit, purpose and growth.

We want to place leaders where they will thrive—and equally as important, where they will help others thrive. We talk with them about what excites them, where they want to stretch and what kinds of communities might challenge and inspire them. For example, I have worked with administrators who specifically wanted to lead in schools with IB programs, French Immersion or particular cultural communities. These preferences matter. It is not just about filling roles—it is about building momentum and setting schools up for long-term success.

We Listen

Let me be clear: these decisions aren’t made in isolation. Our principals and vice-principals are actively involved in the process. We listen to where they feel they can grow, what new experiences they are seeking and where they feel most aligned.  Ongoing growth plan conversations often turn to discussions on opportunities for new experiences.

Sometimes they are ready for a new challenge. Sometimes they are in the middle of something they want to see through. And sometimes, they just love their school and aren’t ready to let go. I hear all of it—and it deeply shapes the decisions we make.

There have been times when a leader’s personal or family situation led us to delay a move or rethink a placement. These are real people—not just job titles—and we work hard to honour that. When a school leader is in the right place at the right time, you can feel it in the building. It shows up in the energy, the trust and the culture.

This year, one school community started a petition to convince their principal to delay retirement. At another, parents offered to fundraise so their principal might reconsider a job overseas. Neither plan came to life—but both speak volumes about the impact strong leadership has on a school.

What the Research Says

The evidence around school leadership placement is compelling. Studies from the Learning Policy Institute suggest principals (and vice-principals) typically need 5–7 years in a school to make a lasting impact. Anything less, and they may only just start to shape direction. Much longer, and the challenge becomes ensuring continued growth and relevance.

Research from the Wallace Foundation and others highlights that when leadership moves are done intentionally—and with input from the leaders themselves—they strengthen the entire system. Leaders carry forward lessons, ideas and a sense of continuity that benefits multiple communities over time.

This extensive body of research has helped shape our own approach in West Vancouver: balancing stability with strategic movement in a way that supports individual growth and system-wide impact.

And Yes—We Think About This a Lot

Whenever announcements come out, I hear the question: “Who decided this?”

Well—me. But never alone. These are collaborative conversations. This part of my work is deeply personal. It’s where people and strategy intersect. There is no algorithm for culture fit or team chemistry. It takes reflection, input and a lot of listening.

And I know how much it matters. Our principals and vice-principals aren’t just running schools—they’re building culture, guiding learning and shaping what school feels like for students, staff and families.

A Complicated Puzzle

Leadership placements are rarely straightforward. With so many voices, needs, and aspirations in the mix, we know there will be times when the outcome doesn’t match everyone’s hopes. That doesn’t mean people weren’t heard or valued—it simply reflects the complexity of balancing individual preferences with the broader needs of our schools and students. These decisions are never easy, and we approach them with care and humility.

And in the days immediately following these announcements, I often learn as much about our team as I do through any interview. The way people respond—whether they’re feeling excited, uncertain, disappointed, or all of the above—says a great deal. It’s not about masking emotion; it’s about how we carry ourselves through change. Those early reactions often reflect a leader’s sense of professionalism, perspective, and commitment to the bigger picture. I’ve come to really value that quiet strength and grace that so many of our leaders bring during these moments of transition.

Final Thought

I have been doing this long enough to know that leadership placements matter—to staff, to families and to communities. That’s a good thing. It means our leaders are making a difference.

Our goal remains the same: to put great people in the right places, support their growth and strengthen every school community in the process. At the end of the day, thoughtful leadership placements create the conditions where students can be successful —academically, socially, and emotionally—which is ultimately what all of this work is about.

The image at the top of this post was generated through AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »

The phrase “all means all” sounds like common sense—after all, who would argue against it? But for it to be more than just a slogan, we must ask: What does it truly mean? And how do we ensure it becomes a guiding principle rather than an empty phrase?

In West Vancouver Schools, we are guided by three key commitments: fostering innovation, ensuring a strong foundation in essential skills, and embracing the principle that all means all. While innovation and foundational learning provide the structure, inclusion is the heart of our work. It is not a goal we reach but an ongoing responsibility—one that challenges us to continually adapt, reflect, and improve. Innovation connects to our work in AI and physical literacy. Our commitment to core skills is evident in our focus on literacy and numeracy. But inclusion—’all means all’—is broader. And if we don’t return to it with intention, it risks becoming just another phrase.

While inclusion is sometimes viewed narrowly as the work of Student Support Services, all means all extends to every student in every classroom. It is about ensuring that learning is personalized, responsive, and flexible enough to meet the specific needs of each learner. In West Vancouver, we have evolved from focusing narrowly on targeted interventions for specific groups—such as ELL learners or students with designations—to a broader recognition that, inclusive of priority populations and vulnerable learners, every student deserves personalized support, regardless of labels. Inclusion is not simply about bringing students into the same physical space—it is about ensuring they are truly seen, supported, and challenged in meaningful ways.

The Journey of Continuous Growth

The work of inclusion is never finished. There is no single program, policy, or initiative that will allow us to say, we have arrived. Instead, all means all is a mindset—one that requires us to ask difficult questions, recognize barriers, and continuously refine our practices.

We must ask ourselves:
– Are we designing learning experiences that reflect the needs, strengths, and interests of all students? For instance, when planning a project-based learning unit, are we providing multiple entry points and ways to demonstrate understanding?
– Do our structures, assessments, and teaching practices allow for different pathways to success? Consider how our assessment practices have evolved to include student voice and choice in demonstrating their learning.
– Are we leveraging all available tools—technology, data, and human insight—to support each student effectively? This might mean using learning analytics to identify patterns in student engagement or implementing flexible scheduling to accommodate different learning paces.


This is not about lowering expectations or making learning easier. It is about ensuring that all students have the support they need to succeed at the highest levels. In fact, we recognize that our parent community holds high expectations for their children’s success, and we are committed to partnering with families to extend learning beyond our classroom walls. All means all means ensuring that students who need more—more time, more flexibility, more challenge—get what they need without stigma. It means recognizing that inclusion is not about fitting students into existing systems but about adapting our systems to serve them better.

Innovation Enhancing Inclusion

Innovation is not just about technology but about mindset. However, emerging tools, including AI, have the potential to help us take our commitment to all means all further. I was recently in an elementary classroom and saw an educational assistant using AI to adapt a piece of writing in real-time, ensuring the content matched both the learning goals and the student’s current level. In another classroom, a new student to Canada was actively participating in complex class discussions through an AI translation tool, allowing them to share their insights while developing their English skills.

AI offers opportunities to personalize learning in ways that were previously unimaginable. It can provide immediate feedback that adapts to each student’s pace, offer multiple pathways to understanding complex concepts, and help teachers identify patterns in student learning that might otherwise go unnoticed. For families, these tools can bridge the school-home connection, providing ways to support learning in their first language and helping parents engage more deeply with their children’s education.

At the same time, we must approach AI with intention and equity at the forefront. This means ensuring all students have access to these tools, not just those with resources at home. It means carefully selecting and implementing AI tools that support our inclusive practices rather than creating new barriers. It means working closely with provincial outreach partners to expand and maximize access to technology for those who need additional specialized supports.  Most importantly, it means using AI to enhance—not replace—the human connections that make learning meaningful. When thoughtfully integrated, AI becomes another tool in our toolkit for ensuring that all truly means all.

Building Our Inclusive Future—Together

Our commitment to all means all is not about checking a box or meeting a target. It is about ongoing reflection and continuous improvement. It is about every student, in every classroom, feeling seen, supported, and challenged. And it is about using every tool at our disposal—our expertise, our creativity, and yes, even AI—to meet our most ambitious goal: ensuring that every student, no matter their starting point, has the opportunity to flourish.

There is no finish line. There is only the ongoing work of making all means all more real every day, supported by a community of educators, families, and partners who share this vision of true inclusion. By ensuring that every student belongs and thrives, we are not just shaping better schools, we are shaping a more inclusive society. This is how ‘all means all’ moves from words to action, from slogan to substance.

The image at the top of this post was generated through Magic School AI.  Various AI tools were used as feedback helpers (for our students this post would be a Yellow assignment – see link to explanation chart) as I edited and refined my thinking.

Read Full Post »

Ironically, by integrating generative AI tools in schools, we might empower ourselves to focus less on screens and more on human connection, simplifying tasks so that technology becomes a supporting player rather than the main act.

This idea has been rattling around in my head for a while now, partly because it feels so counterintuitive.  The image at the top of this post is a slide from presentations I have been giving lately on AI.   AI is often seen as another layer of technology that increases our dependence on devices, but what if it can actually do the opposite? What if AI’s ability to handle repetitive, time-consuming tasks allowed us to reallocate student time and focus on areas that emphasize creativity, connection, and collaboration?

Take the ubiquitous PowerPoint presentation as an example. Right now, students spend hours designing slides—choosing fonts, aligning images, and adjusting transitions—when the real value lies in the ideas they’re presenting. Imagine if AI could generate the slides for them in minutes, leaving more time for practicing their delivery, refining their arguments, or engaging in meaningful dialogue with peers and teachers about the topic. The focus shifts from the tool to the content, and from the screen to the human interaction.

Or consider note-taking. Today, students often type madly while their teacher is speaking, their eyes glued to their laptops or tablets, trying to capture every word. AI tools can now summarize lectures in real time or even generate notes automatically from audio recordings. With this burden lifted, students could engage more fully in discussions, ask thoughtful questions, or simply listen. This reallocation of attention—from typing to thinking—is where the potential lies.

And it doesn’t stop there. AI can analyze data for science projects, generate essay outlines, and create study guides tailored to individual needs. Each of these tasks, currently requiring significant screen time, could be offloaded to AI, allowing students to spend more time on hands-on experiments, peer reviews, or physical, collaborative activities like building prototypes or role-playing historical events.

 From Efficiency to Human Connection

Initially, it’s easy to think about these shifts in terms of efficiency—getting more done in less time. But I believe there’s a deeper opportunity here, one that’s more human. By removing some of the digital drudgery, we can refocus on the things that make education rich and meaningful: relationships, creativity, and shared experiences.

What if, instead of students individually creating digital flashcards for hours, they spent that time playing learning games together? What if the hours saved from not editing videos for a media project were spent brainstorming as a group or rehearsing for a live presentation? These shifts could bring back the human element that has sometimes felt crowded out by screens.

Even more intriguing is the potential for AI to free up teachers in similar ways. If AI can help with grading or lesson planning, teachers might have more time for one-on-one conversations with students or for designing experiential learning opportunities. The classroom could become less about sitting behind screens and more about shared exploration and growth.

Innovation in AI and Physical Literacy

In West Vancouver, we have been discussing innovation around two key areas: AI and physical literacy. This juxtaposition is intentional, as we begin to think about how these two seemingly opposite areas can work together. On one hand, AI has the potential to simplify and streamline tasks, freeing up time. On the other, physical literacy emphasizes movement, health, and engagement in the physical world. Together, they could create a more balanced and holistic approach to education, where technology supports human connection and physical activity rather than replacing it.

Earlier this month we did a session with school and parent leaders that looked at innovation in these areas and the linkages and it was met with a lot of interest.  My colleague, Assistant Superintendent Sandra-Lynn Shortall also wrote an excellent blog post on some of her thinking in this area earlier this month, Bots, Bodies & Balance: Embracing AI, Movement and Co-Regulation in Education.


A Work in Progress

Of course, I recognize that this vision might be naïve. Technology has a way of creeping into every corner of our lives, and the idea that AI will reduce overall screen time might be overly optimistic. It’s entirely possible that the efficiencies created by AI will simply lead to new tech-based activities filling the gaps, perpetuating the cycle rather than breaking it.

Moreover, this transition would require deliberate choices by educators and school leaders. AI won’t automatically shift the focus to human connection—we have to intentionally design learning environments that prioritize it. This involves rethinking instruction, supporting teachers, and ensuring that we use AI as a tool to enhance, not replace, the human elements of education.  

Embracing the Paradox

The idea that more advanced technology could lead to less reliance on technology feels paradoxical, but perhaps that’s where the real promise lies. If we can embrace AI as a means to simplify, streamline, and refocus, we might find ourselves in a world where technology truly supports learning rather than dominating it. It’s a shift from using tech for tech’s sake to using it as a tool to deepen our humanity.

This is still a work in progress for me—a mix of hope, curiosity, and skepticism. I’d love to hear from others: Do you think AI could lead to less technology use in schools? What would it take to make that happen? And how do we ensure that the efficiencies created by AI translate into richer, more connected learning experiences for our students?

For this post, I used several AI tools (Chat GPT, Claude, Magic School) as feedback helpers to refine my thinking and assist in the editing process.

Read Full Post »

As change accelerates at an unprecedented pace, particularly with AI, 2025 calls for something deeper than speed—it calls for thriving. After a year devoted to acceleration in 2024, I find myself drawn to a word that represents not just progress, but flourishing in every aspect of leadership and life. Whether it’s coaching youth sports, lacing up my shoes for morning running, or leading groundbreaking AI initiatives in our district, “thrive” captures the essence of what I aim to achieve in 2025. Thrive also more broadly speaks to me as not just a professional goal, but one that hits my personal goals as well.

This marks the 10th year of my “One Word” tradition. Looking back at 2024 and “accelerate,” it was a year of urgency and innovation. We embraced the challenge of supporting AI across our district and networking with jurisdictions around BC, Canada and the world. We advanced literacy and numeracy initiatives and focused on mental and physical health. The pace was intense but rewarding. While acceleration was about building momentum, thriving is about sustaining and flourishing with that momentum.

Why Thrive for 2025?

Sustainable Innovation

Thriving means not just keeping pace with change, but shaping it thoughtfully. In the fast-evolving AI landscape, it’s about balancing innovation with educational fundamentals. We’ll approach AI integration like I approach basketball coaching – start with the fundamentals (critical thinking, collaboration, creativity) and then layer in innovative tools that enhance these core skills. Just as a strong defensive foundation enables more dynamic offensive plays, strong teaching fundamentals will ensure our AI efforts enhance learning rather than overshadow it.

Collective Growth

True thriving isn’t just about individual success; it’s about collective achievement. Watching young athletes develop skills, seeing educators embrace new technologies, and spending meaningful time with family all contribute to a sense of shared growth. Thriving lifts us all.

Depth and Breadth

Like training for a marathon, thriving requires both speed work and endurance. It’s about growing deeper in our initiatives while broadening their reach. Whether it’s making new learning approaches and tools accessible for all educators or deepening relationships within my community, thriving ensures our progress is impactful and lasting. For example, this year, I am focusing on spending more time in classrooms learning with and from teachers using AI in their classes.

Balance

Thriving captures the delicate harmony between pushing boundaries and maintaining well-being. Balancing district leadership, being involved in youth sports, running, blogging, and family time demands intentionality. For me, this means protecting my early morning runs as devotedly as I guard time for family dinners and summer basketball trips, and approaching my district leadership with equal enthusiasm and presence.

Resilience

To thrive means to grow stronger through challenges. Whether it’s navigating the complexities of educational transformation or powering through the final stretch of a long run, thriving requires adaptability and the ability to turn obstacles into opportunities. My run streak is never boring – I plan to run at least 5 km everyday this year, just like I have for almost 4 years.

Impact

At its core, thriving is about making a meaningful difference. In our district, it’s about fostering environments where students flourish. In sports, it’s about shaping not just skilled players but well-rounded individuals. At home, it’s about nurturing relationships that energize and sustain us.

Moving Forward

As I look ahead to 2025, I’m excited to transform the momentum of acceleration into a year of thriving. Whether it’s crafting my next blog post, leading an AI initiative, coaching a game, or stepping out for an early morning run, my goal isn’t just to participate or succeed—it’s to embrace every opportunity fully and flourish in all I do.

I’m curious – what word will guide your journey in 2025? How does it reflect your hopes and aspirations for the year ahead? Share your word, and together, let’s inspire each other to thrive.

Previous One Word Posts:

2016 – Hungry

2017 – Hope

2018 – Relevance

2019 – Delight

2020 – Hustle

2021 – Optimism

2022 – Focus

2023- Coached

2024 – Accelerate

I used Chat GPT to create the image at the top of the post.  I also used both Chat GPT and Claude in the brainstorming phase of my word selection.  I described what I was hoping to accomplish in 2025 and used AI to help generate potential words from which to choose.

Read Full Post »

This is not my last post of the year, but as we move through the middle December I wanted to pull together various threads and posts from this year on AI, and a few thoughts about what comes next. I find myself reflecting on what has been a transformative year for me as an educator, leader, and writer. Few technologies in my career have reshaped the way I think, work, and innovate as rapidly as AI has over the past twelve months.

This year, I have explored the opportunities and challenges of AI in education in a series of blog posts. It has been a journey of enthusiasm, curiosity, and learning, punctuated by moments of skepticism and concern. Now, as we approach 2025, I sense that we may be entering what the Gartner Hype Cycle calls the Trough of Disillusionment. And yet, I believe this is where the real work begins.

Here is my best effort at pulling together various posts I have written, presentations I have participated in and other learnings from this year:

Blog Posts

Gen AI – Governments, Districts, and Schools (May) Examining how British Columbia’s education system addresses generative AI, detailing the roles of the provincial government in providing guidance and resources, and individual school districts in implementing specific tools and fostering community engagement.

Leveraging Generative AI for Elementary Learners at Home (Sept) Offering parents practical advice on integrating generative AI into their children’s home learning, suggesting activities like using AI for writing assistance, personalized learning paths, and creative projects, while emphasizing the importance of safety and balance.

Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Supporting Governance (Sept) Exploring how generative AI can enhance school district governance by aiding in communication, professional development, policy drafting, strategic planning, and scenario analysis, advocating for a learning mindset among leaders.

Gen AI and the High School Sports Coach (Oct) This piece discusses the potential of generative AI to support high school sports coaches in areas such as creating training plans, simulating game strategies, preventing injuries, providing performance feedback, and developing skills, while acknowledging the importance of human judgment.

The Stages of Gen AI Adoption in Schools (Oct) Outlining a three-stage process for integrating generative AI in education: personal use by staff, professional use for tasks like lesson planning, and direct application with students, emphasizing gradual adoption to build confidence.

Leading the AI Charge:  Strategies for Forward Thinking Districts (Oct) Sharing strategies for school districts to effectively integrate AI, including designating leadership roles, forming cross-functional teams, creating clear guidelines, focusing on key applications, engaging the community, modeling AI use, consulting external experts, and participating in networks.

When AI Meets Education:  The Power of Diffusion Over Replication (Nov) A reflection  on the organic adoption of AI in education, advocating for trust in educators to adapt AI tools to their unique contexts, and promoting the diffusion of innovation through professional dialogue and shared experiences.

Video Presentations

The West Vancouver Story (Sept) – Cari Wilson, Megan Roughley and I share perspectives from our different vantage points on the use of AI in West Vancouver.  

AI Unlocked (Oct) – Presentation specifically for support staff in West Vancouver with an overview of AI and ways it could be incorporated into work that support staff do.  

Generative AI in K-12 (Oct) – Cari Wilson and I along with grade 12 student Jadyn Mithani shared our current work in AI and advice as part of a UBC speakers series.

Alec Couros Presentation (Oct) – West Vancouver has worked with Alec Couros from the University of Regina as we grow AI understanding in our community.  This video is a presentation he did for parents in the community.

Where I am Learning

On social media, I am finding LinkedIn to be my go to place for AI learning.  If I identified a couple people to add to your network they would be Adam Garry and Leon Furze.  Adam works with school districts across North American, including West Vancouver, as we look to thoughtfully plan for AI use in our systems and Leon is out of Australia and digs deep into both practical and ethical considerations around AI.

I also find podcasts super helpful.  There are lots of good ones, but the one I listen to every week is the TED AI Show with Bilawal Sidhu.

Of course, much of AI is just about playing.  I find myself going to AI first before Google, and regularly thinking if AI could add value – either efficiency or quality to the work I am doing.  


Reflections on the Year

As I look back, I’m struck by how much my thinking has evolved. At the start of the year, AI felt like an exciting frontier—a tool to experiment with and explore. By mid-year, it became clear that AI is no longer optional for educators. It’s a fundamental shift that requires us to rethink everything from pedagogy to policy.

Now, I see the cracks emerging—the Trough of Disillusionment. Educators are grappling with questions about bias, misinformation, and the ethical use of AI. Some are even questioning whether the promises of AI can be fulfilled. These doubts are natural. They are a sign that we’re moving beyond the initial hype and beginning to confront the complexities and possible outcomes.

Moving Forward with Hope

What gives me hope is that education has always been about people, not technology. AI is a powerful agent—but it’s our creativity, empathy, and leadership that will determine its impact. As we move into 2025, I am committed to continuing to push this dialogue and think about the impact of AI on our system today and into the future.

I am so appreciative of my network –  thank you for engaging with these ideas this year.  As I have regularly noted, it is the power of the network that is crucial in our AI work. Whether you’ve agreed, challenged, or simply reflected, widespread engagement has made the conversation richer and is crucial as we look ahead.

My “Top 3” Post will come next week, but for all wrapping up in schools this week before the break – Happy Holidays!

Ironically, I did not use a lot of AI in this week’s post.  The image at the top is generated in Magic School AI.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »