Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Richmond Review’

I Miss Newspapers

Posted in Change, tagged , , , on November 28, 2023| 10 Comments »

I will try not to make this a “You kids, get off my lawn!” kind of post.  

I know newspapers are not completely gone, and there may be a few newspapers in North America finding ways to make it still work with paper copy in a digital world, I often get nostalgic for how things used to be.  This thinking is front of mind this week with the final community newspaper in my hometown, The Richmond News announcing it is discontinuing its once-a-week print edition this week.  Publisher Alan Chow announced this past week:

It’s with a sense of pride for our past accomplishments but also a keen eye to the future that we have made the decision to stop our print edition, with next week’s Richmond News to be the last to roll off the presses.

I feel a particular connection with the Richmond News.  For three years, at the beginning of the century, I had the honour of writing a weekly column.  The editor at the time, Dixon Tam, gave me the wonderful opportunity, and the freedom to write about almost anything I wanted.  I wrote a lot about education, but also about local government, social issues and human interest stories.  While I didn’t get rich at $35 a column, and this wage probably worked out to about $3 an hour considering the work I would put into each 500 word piece, it was one of the best experiences of my life. The Culture of Yes would not exist, if “Kennedy’s Corner” wasn’t a thing in the Richmond News.  One quite naturally led to the other.  It was actually one of the best work experiences of my life.  I had to keep a deadline, do research, was held accountable and develop a thick skin – some of the fax responses to what I wrote were harsh!

I have written before about the loss of local media.  In July of 2015, the Richmond Review closed its doors. At that time, I said:

Community newspapers don’t get enough credit for the important role they play with our school system.  They are so often our storytellers.  They tell the narratives of our kids, our teams, our musicals, our art shows, our academic success and our commitment to service.  They also keep us honest and tell our stories of controversies like bus service changes or school closures , budget decisions and staff misbehaviours.  Community newspapers connect schools to the community. 

If anything, eight years later, I feel more strongly about this.  School districts can tell their stories, but they should not be the only ones telling the stories.  I know this should be my inside voice, but we tell the stories we want to tell. And it is not as though social media fills in the gaps – likewise, people will share their specific perspective on individual issues and so much will be lost.  Newspapers make school systems more accountable, but this in turn also makes them more trusted.  It is not just us telling you our story.

So, just why should you care that there is such little local news coverage if you are a student, teacher, parent or superintendent?

  • The lack of local coverage limits what the community can learn about educational developments in the community.  From new programs to changes in reporting, this education is left to the schools.
  • There is a communication gap.  While schools can communicate with their parents, community papers communicate more broadly.  Events, initiatives, and updates will fall into the “I wish more people knew” hole.  
  • Local papers highlight accomplishments, so the loss of papers mean fewer student achievements are being broadly recognized. It is one less opportunity for public recognition, which can impact improved morale and motivation within the school community.
  • Community newspapers often provide a platform for public engagement, allowing community members to express their opinions, concerns, and feedback. The loss means there is one less channel for schools and schools systems to get a sense for how they are doing. And more broadly, this change is a reduction in civic engagement including topics related to education and the broader public may be less informed about educational policies and decisions that impact the community.
  • Local newspapers contribute to transparency and accountability by reporting on school board decisions, educational policies, and other matters that affect the community. All school jurisdictions strive for openness, and in some is usually framed as a core value, local media helps ensure we live up to this commitment.
  • Local newspapers serve as a historical record, documenting the milestones and events in a community, including its schools. The closure of these newspapers can result in a loss of this historical record, making it challenging to preserve and share the rich history of local education.  I wonder even 20 years from now, where people will look for the history of school systems.  In an era where “everything is on the internet” there are often fewer organized places where we can find a thoughtful history.

I still subscribe to two daily newspapers.  I love taking time to read them.  And I love what they symbolize.  I know in part, they represent an era that is almost in the past.

In another part of Chow’s letter to the community this week, he said:

The news side won’t change, it’s just our delivery side that is seeing a transformation.

Instead of delivering a printed copy of the News to your doorstep once a week, we are delivering Richmond stories to Richmond readers — and readers around the world — every day, 24/7, on our website.

Maybe.

I believe so strongly in the power of change, and the promise of our increasingly digital world.  But I choose to be sad with this change.  Maybe it is nostalgia.  Maybe, it is my belief that more community media would help schools be more trusted.  Maybe, I don’t see examples of legacy print media moving very successfully to a digital world. Maybe, I am not as good at change as I think.

Thanks to Dixon Tam, then the editor of the Richmond News for giving me a chance to become a better writer by printing my column each week for tens of thousands of people to read.  Thanks to all the reporters, in particular Mark Booth, who have covered the community so well.  And continued success to those community newspapers that still exist like the North Shore News – in the community I work.  

For more on this, I also wrote a post a couple years ago, The Importance of Telling the Stories of High School Sports, that, along with my 2015 post, I think are good companion pieces. 

Read Full Post »

Another Reason We Need to Tell Our Stories

Posted in Change, SD45, Social Media, Technology, tagged , , , , , , , , , on July 27, 2015| 6 Comments »

Waste Paper Piles On The Street. Sorting Garbage In Everyday Lif

With a single tweet, the 83 year-old newspaper in my community disappeared. Of course this is nothing new, it is happening in communities across North America as the newspaper business continues to search for its place in the digital world.

RichmondReview

Community newspapers don’t get enough credit for the important role they play with our school system.  They are so often our storytellers.  They tell the narratives of our kids, our teams, our musicals, our art shows, our academic success and our commitment to service.  They also keep us honest and tell our stories of controversies like bus service changes or school closures , budget decisions and staff misbehaviours.  Community newspapers connect schools to community.  In the district I work, we lost one of our two local newspapers last year with the closing of the North Shore Outlook and now this past week, the community I live in has suffered the same fate with the closing of the Richmond Review.

I have tagged more posts “Change” than anything else on my blog.   I champion change.  And we are seeing this change play out in almost every industry.  It is why, I believe, sometimes change in education is so hard.  With so much change in our world, people often hold onto the traditions of school hoping that at least they will stay the same – romanticizing the world we used to have.  And I kind of get it – we are all in favour of change, expect for the things we don’t want to change.  Some of the change feels more like loss.

The Richmond Review felt like more than a community newspaper.  I remember the excitement growing up seeing my name in the paper for something to do with school or sports.  It was great moments of pride for kids and families if their name was in the newspaper.    While I will read the Vancouver Province, Vancouver Sun and Globe & Mail on an almost daily basis, I would read the community newspapers where I lived and worked cover to cover – I would love seeing stories of people I knew or better understanding the views of those I lived and worked with.

Over the years I developed wonderful relationships with several people who worked at the Richmond Review.  In particular Sports Editor Don Fennell became a friend.  I first spoke to him as a high school student, and then probably hundreds of times over the twenty-six years he spent at the paper.  Whether we hadn’t spoken since last week or last year, he had that great ability of picking up a conversation and making one feel so comfortable.  I love his quote in the final edition of the paper, “I don’t like good-byes; I love Richmond.”  Don and the others at the paper made the community better.

Of course earlier this year when a deal was announced that saw the other local paper the Richmond News and the Richmond Review come under one owner – it was clear something was going to change.  This story has been repeated across North America.  And while I might be a little jaded thinking how unfair it was to kill-off an 83 year-old community paper with two days notice in the middle of summer, it doesn’t change the fact that despite the greatest efforts newspapers have been unable to transition into a viable economic model in the new digital world.  Surviving, not thriving describes most of the local newspaper that continue.

But this blog is largely about education and what does this change have to do with education?  Actually a lot!

If teachers, coaches, principals, schools and school districts need yet another reason why they need to be storytellers in the digital age this is it.  Local newspapers have long been our storytellers and these stories are important.  We need to tell them.  It is not enough for our websites to be information rich, they need to be rich in stories of the people.  If the North Shore Outlook and Richmond Review are not around to tell stories of our great young soccer players, or the high school performance of Grease, or the students going to Africa to build a school we need to tell these stories.

So, you want another reason to start a blog or change your website?  We can no longer rely on the traditional community media to tell our stories.  And people still want to hear these stories.  We need to tell them.

We need to write, photograph and video what is happening in our schools and then bring it to people’s attention.  Kids still want to see their names in the newspaper – we just need to figure out what that looks like in our world.

Read Full Post »

Early Sports Specialization and Its Links to Education

Posted in Change, Health, tagged , , , , , , , on May 31, 2014| 9 Comments »

kids-300x255

Outside of work, I spend many hours coaching my kids and other parents’ kids in school and community sports.  There is a  lively debate right now in the youth sports community about the value of focusing exclusively on a single sport from a young age. I wrote on the topic in a 2012 post on the Multi-Sport High School Athlete, and in 2013 on Being a Sports Parent Today.  Part of what really draws me to this challenge in youth sports are the parallels and similar debates in education.

I find the conversation around sports and whether we should be keeping score and ranking players and teams from youth, akin to the conversation around the purpose and appearance of elementary school report cards. Letter grades are very much like keeping score; those who argue for them remind us of the competitive nature of the world we live in and the need to let kids know where they stand, with those opposed contending the real competition is with oneself, learning and improving skills and the relative comparison to others is really secondary.

I also find the challenges for new providers in the youth sports game very similar to what has happened and is happening in education.  A generation ago it was the local community sports associations who were organizing youth sports. If you wanted to play hockey, soccer or basketball there was really only one option available.  Now, there are dozens — traditional community providers sharing the stage with other non-profit organizations, for-profit enterprises, as well as a series of new sport providers in as many sports capacities.  Similarly, in education we see public education challenged by independent schools for market share, and even less traditional options for learning like for-profit tutoring companies and completely virtual options like the Kahn Academy.

Youth sports, like learning options for young people, is in a time of transition — and it is part of what makes it an exciting time.

With that as a backdrop, here are my recent comments I shared for an article by Don Fennell, Sports Editor for the Richmond Review, Year-round sports mode: top athletes, coaches share their thoughts. I have also included the comments of my wife and oldest daughter on the topic from the article because the thoughts are really ‘all in the family’.

The shifts happening in youth sports are far more complex than just being good or bad, says educator Chris Kennedy, who is also a former president of the B.C. High School Boys’ Basketball Association.

“With the opportunity to go year-round, we have seen the traditional season disappear for almost all sports,” he says. “And there are some real concerns. There is a lot of research that early specialization leads to fatigue and burnout and overuse injuries. It also seems to serve the adults more than the kids. Kids are looking to have fun and often it is the adults’ competitiveness that is driving the decisions their kids make. There is also research that suggests adults who specialized in one sport growing up have higher rate of adult physical inactivity.”

Kennedy says the related debate with increased early specialization is whether sports should be more or less “score-focused” at younger ages. He thinks youth soccer and basketball have it right: de-emphasize scoring at younger ages and focus on development.

“This doesn’t mean we don’t want kids to be competitive, but do we need to keep score and have a focus on winning and losing all the time?,” he asks. “I like the race to nowhere metaphor and how it applies to youth sports. Parents are killing themselves to get their kids to so-called elite training that is getting in the way of being a kid and what is really the goal.”

Kennedy’s wife, Stephanie, is equally passionate about the topic. She has always believed that kids should be exposed to and participate in as many different sports as possible while they are young. And for a variety of reasons.

“I know through my own four children that all kids have their own structural make-up, both physically and mentally, and that different sports may cater to these differences,” she says. “I truly believe there is a sport for all kids, but it may take some effort and time to find out what that is. And in today’s age of childhood obesity, low activity levels, access to electronics and the resulting de-socialization of youth, sport can play a key role in reversing these trends.”

Stephanie, who runs Panther Cheer Athletics, is also adamant that kids participating in as many sports as possible when they’re young aids their physical development. This doesn’t mean, she says, they must do multiple sports at the same time, but within a calendar year should shift from one activity to another.

“This allows children’s young bodies, which are often growing and changing so rapidly, to adapt and hopefully grow stronger with minimal injuries,” she says. “I know from personal experience as a provincial level gymnast that I enjoyed the opportunity to play intramural sports (such as volleyball, basketball and soccer) in high school but began to resent the fact I wasn’t able to participate in these in any large way as gymnastics took most of my time. It also alienated me from my peers who played more conventional team sports and were members of high school teams. “

The eldest of the couple’s four children, Elizabeth, 12, thinks those who focus on one sport may quickly tire of it, burn out and then have no other alternatives.

“It is also more likely you will be injured because you are using the same body parts over and over,” she says. “(Alternately), if you play a lot of sports you have the chance to meet a far more diverse group of people and learn a diverse group of skills.”

Elizabeth says unfortunately sports out of the mainstream don’t get enough exposure and because kids don’t know about them “they may never try a sport they could be really good at or have a passion for.”

“Coaches in some sports are also organizing so many practices (young athletes) don’t have time to try other sports,” she adds. “I think there will be many more overuse injuries and once their career in that sport is over they won’t know what to do because they will feel it is too late to try a new sport.”

The entire article is worth a read here.  It is interesting that there is general consensus from all those interviewed of the value of young people playing a range of sports. So, I am left wondering, if we all believe this to be the right approach why then is this topic such an issue?  I think we may know it to be right on the theoretical level, but in the heat of  “keeping of with the Joneses” we have trouble letting our actions reflect this approach.

Read Full Post »